“Australian Interior Authority” campaign linked to Australian branch of ad company @DraftFCB
Mr O’Hagan has not yet returned a call asking about the campaign. Online speculation continues about who the campaign might be for.
ADDITIONAL: One suggestion is that the campaign is for the Australian branch of tobacco company Philip Morris, as DraftFCB worked for Fortune Tobacco (now merged with Philip Morris) in the Philippines in 2008. However, Philip Morris is a supporter of the Alliance of Australian Retailers, the organisation campaigning against plain cigarette-pack laws in Australia. A spokeswoman for the Alliance said the Australian Interior Authority campaign was “nothing to do with us”. Unless there is a split in the tobacco companies’ campaign against plain packaging laws, that indicates that the AIA campaign is for some other client.



An interesting twist to this saga. Like many people I’d suspected the tobacco lobby of organising this.
No matter who its for though, they’ve certainly garnered plenty of attention for themselves. Reminds me of that Gabbo episode of The Simpsons!
Gabbo? Who’s Gabbo? I MUST find out! ;)
These have just appeared last week. Definitely something to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kUs9gPW6f8&feature=related
[...] Google – nowadays the most instantaneous detective of all – has lead most of us to discover fairly quickly that the campaign has been outed as NOT associated with the tobacco industry. Calls to the Alliance of Australian Retailers have garnered simply a shrug of the shoulders and a flat denial. My source is quite clear in its insistence: there is something more sinister at play than a continuation of the Nanny State ads. So whatever they are campaigning for… it sure ain’t tobacco. http://brisbaneblog.info/2011/07/australian-interior-authority-campaign-linked-to-australian-branch-... [...]
wow how political – stay home after curfew